search  
 
  
Military Pay: Garnishment
Military Pay
 Section Index
Garnishment
  Child Support and Alimony Fact Sheet
 Child Support and Alimony Q&A
 Commercial Debt Garnishment from Federal Civilian Employees
 Commonly Asked Questions About Commercial Garnishments
 Involuntary Allotment from Military Personnel for Commercial Debt Fact Sheet
 Involuntary Allotments from Military Personnel for Commercial Debt Q&A
 Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act Bulletin Fact Sheet
Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act Q&A
 Court Order Copy Request Information
  DFAS-CL Garnishment Operations Fax Helpful Hints
 Activated Reservists with Child Support obligations
 Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act Q&Aprint page :: email page  

1. The court awarded me 50% of my former spouse's retired pay which had accrued as of the date of our divorce. Why do I need to get a clarifying order to have my award enforced under the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA)?

Without a clarifying order, there is no way to determine the amount of what your award should be under USFSPA. Military retired pay is an entitlement based on the service member's rank and number of years of creditable service at the time of retirement. It is paid on a monthly basis and as such is not a fund which can be valued or divided as of some point in time, either before or after the member's retirement. Thus, it is not comparable to a company's private retirement plan, which can be identified as a specific amount and can be divided as of a particular date. The USFSPA requires that an award of a portion of a member's retired pay as property must be expressed in dollars or as a percentage of disposable retired pay. 10 U.S.C. 1408(a)(2)(C). Therefore, a clarifying order would be necessary in those cases where the award is not so expressed.

2. My award of a portion of the member's military retired pay as property is expressed as a formula with the numerator as the number of years we were married while the member performed military service creditable for retirement. I was told I had to get a clarifying order because this "number" was not provided in the court order. Why is this the case when our marriage and divorce dates, and the member's service entry date, were given in the court order?

An award of military retired pay as property expressed as a formula or hypothetical retired pay amount may be enforced under the USFSPA without a clarifying order only if the requirements of the proposed regulations) are met. The regulation is the DoD Financial Management Regulation and the citation is Volume 7b, DoD FMR Chapter 29. With regard to an award expressed as a formula, the only number supplied by DFAS will be the number of years of creditable service. All other information must be contained in the court ordered formula .

3. Why does it take so long for me to begin to receive payments under the Act after I apply?

The USFSPA requires that your payments must begin not later than 90 days after effective service of your application for payments on the designated agent. 10 U.S.C. 1408(d)(1). This 90 day requirement gives DFAS enough time to process your application, and provide the member with the notice that USFSPA requires. The member has 30 days from the date the notice was mailed to provide evidence as to why payments should not begin. No payments can be made until after the 30 day notice period. Also, since payments of military retired pay are only made once each month, the commencement of your payments must be coordinated with the monthly retired pay cycle.

4. I applied for enforcement of both my child support and retired pay property awards under USFSPA. My application for child support was honored, but my application for property payments was not. I was told that the reason was that the court lacked jurisdiction over the member. What's the problem? My divorce decree stated that the court had jurisdiction over the member.

The USFSPA has a separate jurisdiction requirement for enforcement of property awards. The USFSPA states that the court must have had jurisdiction over the member by reason of (A) his residence, other than because of military assignment, in the territorial jurisdiction of the court, (B) his domicile in the territorial jurisdiction of the court, or (C) his consent to the jurisdiction of the court. 10 U.S.C. 1408(c)(4). The court may have had jurisdiction over an absent member by reason of some state statute, but that type of jurisdiction may not be the type that legally satisfies the requirement for purposes of the USFSPA. This special jurisdiction requirement does not apply to enforcement of alimony and child support awards.

5. I was married to my former spouse for 8 years while my former spouse was performing military service creditable for retirement. I was awarded a portion of my former spouse's military retired pay as property in our divorce decree. My application for property payments under the USFSPA was turned down, even though my former spouse waived the ten year requirement in our divorce decree. Why?

In order for a division of retired pay as property award to be enforced under the USFSPA, the former spouse must have been married to the military member for 10 years or more during which the member performed at least 10 years of service creditable in determining the member's eligibility for retirement. 10 U.S.C. 1408(d)(2). This is a requirement to receive payments under the USFSPA, which cannot be waived by either party. However, retired members may always make the payment themselves. This requirement does not apply to enforcement of awards for alimony or child support.

6. My former spouse has been receiving military retired pay for several years, and has not paid me any of my portion of his retired pay as a property award. Can I collect any of the arrearages under USFSPA?

No, the USFSPA does not provide for the collection of arrearages of retired pay as property or alimony. Payments under USFSPA are prospective only. See Volume 7b, DoD Financial Management Regulation, Chapter 29, Subchapter 290304.

However, child support arrearages set forth in the pertinent court order may now be collected under USFSPA. 10 U.S.C. 1408(d)(6). Regulations to implement this statute have not been published yet. Alimony and child support arrearages may also be collectible by garnishment under a different statute, 42 U.S.C. 659. A former spouse should consult his or her attorney for additional assistance regarding garnishments. This web site also contains information regarding this topic .

7. What are the current requirements for service of documents, and certification of documents?

Court orders no longer need to be served by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. They may now be served by facsimile or electronic transmission or by regular mail. Court orders must be copies of documents certified by the clerk of courts as to their authenticity. Photocopies of certified documents are acceptable. Certified copies of court orders to enforce child support under USFSPA need not have been certified .

8. I understand that because my former spouse was married to me for over ten years while I was on active duty that she is entitled to a portion of my military retired pay. Is this true?

No. The USFSPA does not provide entitlement to military retired pay. However, the USFSPA does provide an avenue for a former spouse to receive a direct payment of up to 50% of disposable retired pay when: the former spouse was married to a service member for 10 years or more concurrent with creditable service for retirement and a court treats the military retired pay as marital property.

9. Does the USFSPA require division of military retired pay in a divorce?

The USFSPA does NOT automatically divide retired pay as property. However, it does authorize state courts to treat military retired pay either as property of the retiree or as the property of the retiree and his or her former spouse in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction of such courts. A court may award more than 50 percent of a retired service member's pay check to the former spouse as property but the Government is authorized only to send up to 50 percent of "disposable retired pay" directly to the former spouse as property.

10. What constitutes "disposable" retired pay for division in a divorce? "Disposable" retired pay is defined in 10 U.S. Code, Section 1408(a) (4) of P.L. 97-252, as amended by P.L.99-661, Nov. 14, 1986 and Section 555 of P.L. 101-510, Nov. 5, 1990. Disposable retired pay is the gross monthly pay entitlement, including renounced pay, less authorized deductions.

For divorce, dissolution of marriage, annulments, and legal separations that become effective on or after February 3, 1991, the authorized deductions are:

a. Amounts owed to the United States for previous overpayments of retired pay and the recoupments required by law resulting from entitlement to retired pay.
b. Forfeitures of retired pay ordered by court-martial.
c. Amounts waived in order to receive compensation under Title 5 or 38 of USC.
d. Premiums paid as a result of an election under 10 U.S. Code Chapter 73 to provide an annuity to a spouse or former spouse to whom payment of a portion of such member's retired pay is being made pursuant to a court order.
e. The amount of the member's retired pay under 10 U.S. Code Chapter 61 computed using the percentage of the member's disability on the date when the member was retired (or the date on which the member's name was placed on the temporary disability retired list).

11. I was awarded a portion of the member's retired pay as a fixed dollar amount but I do not receive any cost of living increases ( COLA ) as ordered by the court. Why can't I receive COLAs?

The implementing regulations for the USFSPA state, that COLAs are payable only for those awards that are based on a division of retired pay awarded as a percentage or fraction of the member's retired pay. See Volume 7b, DoD FMR, Chapter 29, Subchapter 290902.

12. I established an allotment to pay my former spouse her portion of my retirement one month after our divorce. She has now applied for direct payments and effective this month, DFAS began sending her payments. Since the allotment was not stopped I request that you recover the overpayment from my former spouse and return the funds to me.

We are required to provide you thirty (30) days notice prior to the commencement of payments to your former spouse. This affords you the opportunity to submit evidence that the court order is defective, or has been modified, superseded or set aside, and to cancel any voluntary allotments you may have established for the same obligation. It is your responsibility to stop any voluntary allotment for the same obligation. Our office has no authority to cancel a voluntary allotment. Therefore, we are unable to comply with your request to recover any overpayment made to your former spouse as a result of a voluntary allotment. We suggest that you contact the overpaid party directly for reimbursement.

13. Can I use an order from a court of a foreign country to collect my payments pursuant to the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA)?

No. We can honor orders issued by courts as defined in the USFSPA. The USFSPA defines "court" as "any court of competent jurisdiction of any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands." If your order was not issued by a court located in one of those named geographical areas, you should consult a private attorney for guidance regarding registering foreign court orders and whether such action will meet the requirements of the USFSPA.

You should be aware that unless all of the other requirements of the USFSPA were met by the original order, we would not be able to honor the request for payments under the USFSPA even after it is registered in a court located in an approved geographical area. Thus, the mere fact of registering a court order will not act as a means to correct Title 10, United States Code, Section 1408 deficiencies in the original court order.

xx